<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamespot Gives GC Version of Zelda 8.9</title>
	<link>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gyorsca</title>
		<link>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-3488</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyorsca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-3488</guid>
		<description>Just a minor thing--on the GC version, you can do a spin attack by quickly twirling the analog stick and pressing B. It's a lot faster than the charge-up version since you can do it as fast as you can spin your analog stick, and you can do it infinitely, as opposed to the Wii version's waiting period. Thus, the GC version's spin attack is superior! (This is actually in the manual--it's not a glitch.) Sorry, I had to say that. I don't mean to be a fanboy. I used the charge-up method for the first fourth or so of the game until I discovered the better method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minor thing&#8211;on the GC version, you can do a spin attack by quickly twirling the analog stick and pressing B. It&#8217;s a lot faster than the charge-up version since you can do it as fast as you can spin your analog stick, and you can do it infinitely, as opposed to the Wii version&#8217;s waiting period. Thus, the GC version&#8217;s spin attack is superior! (This is actually in the manual&#8211;it&#8217;s not a glitch.) Sorry, I had to say that. I don&#8217;t mean to be a fanboy. I used the charge-up method for the first fourth or so of the game until I discovered the better method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abel</title>
		<link>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>a bad job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a bad job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is GameSpot Behind the Times or Out of Touch &#124; The Wii Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Is GameSpot Behind the Times or Out of Touch &#124; The Wii Experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wiiliving.com/gamespot-gives-gc-version-of-zelda-89/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] Our recent post concerning the GameSpot GC and Wii reviews for Zelda:TP also touches on this subject wondering what GameSpot&#8217;s agenda may be or what methodology they use when it comes to rating games. Frankly, I think it&#8217;s time for a regime change where it&#8217;s highly apparent the people working there are looking for nothing but graphical overhauls in their games and not truly looking at what the gaming base is interested in: A fun game. Gone are the days when you could simply add lens flares and bump maps and you could wow gamers into thinking they are having fun until the next graphical trick comes out. That doesn&#8217;t bring in new gamers and only caters to the niche market that does enjoy graphical enhancements over new gameplay ideas and methods. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Our recent post concerning the GameSpot GC and Wii reviews for Zelda:TP also touches on this subject wondering what GameSpot&#8217;s agenda may be or what methodology they use when it comes to rating games. Frankly, I think it&#8217;s time for a regime change where it&#8217;s highly apparent the people working there are looking for nothing but graphical overhauls in their games and not truly looking at what the gaming base is interested in: A fun game. Gone are the days when you could simply add lens flares and bump maps and you could wow gamers into thinking they are having fun until the next graphical trick comes out. That doesn&#8217;t bring in new gamers and only caters to the niche market that does enjoy graphical enhancements over new gameplay ideas and methods. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
