Posted by AndyG as Wii Reviews at 2:06 AM EST
Don Reisinger from the Cnet blog “The Digital Home” has some choice words for Super Mario Galaxy and the reviews that have been coming out. But mainly about Mario Galaxy in his review of the game over on his blog. Calling the game “gimmicky”, “downright ugly”, and in the end “deserves a 7 out of 10″, Don doesn’t seem to share the same opinion that most folks that have played the game share. Of course, he also considers Mario Sunshine to be “one of the better games in the Mario franchise”. While Sunshine was a decent game, it’s no where near one of the better games in the series, but I’ll digress and instead post some of his noteworthy quotes from his review, which may be a strategically planned troll for traffic in which case it’s brilliant.
But after playing through Super Mario Galaxy for the past week, I simply don’t get all the hype surrounding the game. Is it a good game? Sure. Is it a great game? No.
The first thing that struck me about this game was the utter lack of beauty. And while I realize the Wii doesn’t have the horsepower we’ve all come to know and love in the Xbox 360, Playstation 3 or the PC, this game looks no better than games released back in 2001.(My note: Yes it does.)
Is graphics everything? Of course not. But don’t you think Nintendo could have done a slightly better job creating a better looking world? I hate to be picky, but compare this game to Resident Evil 4 on the Gamecube — Nintendo’s last generation device — and there is no contest. And after playing games like Call of Duty 4 and Assassin’s Creed, I can’t help but think this game is downright ugly for this generation.
…
Am I the only person in the world who started playing this game and thought the need to “shake the Wii-mote” back and forth was one of the dumbest aspects of this game?(My note: You just might be the only person in the world that thinks this, yes.)
And I think that’s where Nintendo lost me. With a first-party game, I truly believe the Wii-mote should be inexorably tied to gameplay. Unfortunately, it simply wasn’t. In fact, it almost seemed like this functionality was tacked on at the end because, after all, a Wii game must use that Wii-mote in some way, right? (My Note: Did he not play far enough to use the motion sensing for the Ghost Sprint level or perhaps grabbing any of the “grab” stars at all?)
…
But in the end, I was left wanting more out of this game. Not only does it look downright ugly at times, the tacked-on feel of some of its controls and its utter lack of a compelling story preclude me from calling it the “wonderful” game others have called it. Is it a good game? Yes. Is it great? Not a chance.
If you ask me, this game deserves a 7 out of 10.
Here’s my review of his review: Eeeeyuuckk..
Agree with him? Disagree with him? Does he make some good points or even one? Comment and let us know if you think this guy might be on to something here.
Ryan Bennett Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 2:36 am
As you said, he just wanted attention, and he got it.
The funny thing is, he is probably playing it right now…. on a second play through.
teedub Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 9:23 am
CNET pays him to attract attention, positive or negative. Mission accomplished. I don’t think that even HE believes his own BS.
tito Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
I don’t agree with everything he says, especially the graphics being ugly, but I do agree that there could have been better utilization of the Wii remote. Shaking the remote to do the spin attack could have been just as easily mapped to a button since Mario doesn’t attack where the remote points, he just attacks when the remote is shaken. Also, the grab stars provide no real challenge. You aim at them and they pull you in, you aim at the next one, etc. To me, that’s the definition of “tacked on” - adding an element that serves no purpose other than giving purpose to another element that had little purpose.
The star bits seem a little weak too since there are literally hundreds per level and the only impetus to collect them is a) occasionally to kill an enemy and b) to feed the hungry Lumas (you can argue that you get extra lives by collecting them, but I’d counter that one-ups are waaaay too easy to get in this game so you don’t really need to use star bits for one-ups).
Since you can go back to each level over and over and quickly collect enough star bits to feed the Lumas it just seems like more could have been done with the star bits (e.g. - you have to collect 100 per level and beat the level to get the star).
Additionally, I’m about 40 stars in and I can only name one or two stars that were even remotely hard to get. To end, I enjoy the game a lot, I think it’s a great game, I just have a hard time swallowing that it’s the flawless 10/10 that so many reviews seem to be giving it. After playing for a few weeks I’d give it a strong score for being fun and innovative, but I’d take away a point or two for missing the bulls-eye on a few finer points.
Travis Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 5:49 pm
Wow… i can’t believe he dissed this game just like that… Im on my 167th star. The graphics are amazing and can compete to the 360’s and ps3 graphics. And the purplr coins were so hard on some of them. I was about to give up. But i don’t give up without a challenge!
Adrian Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 6:43 pm
first, ok travis, i hope you meant 67th star and 167th because the game only has a total of 121 stars. second, the guy has no idea what his talking about. this game is amazing. maybe not 10/10 but i would say 9/10 or so, as for the graphics, theyre better than anything ive seen on the wii so far.
Aeoas Said,
November 27, 2007 @ 8:40 pm
I must admit Super Mario Galaxy was rather short (mostly because I did not stop playing…)
But! The whole way through the game I was entraced by it’s beauty, music and simplistic easy to learn and entertaing gameplay!
You seriously must not like Mario because with this game I had the most fun and enjoyable time I have had from a game in a long time!
Your like the negative feedback that is never pleased! What could possibly be perfect in your ever-unpleasant attitude?
I think your standards are just to high, this is a great game!
I’m still playing it!
teedub Said,
November 28, 2007 @ 12:28 am
FTR, I don’t shake the remote to perform the spin attack, I shake the nunchuk. It’s far less intrusive I find. After a short session tonight, there are some minor quibbles, combined with a video on Gametrailers showing the visual similarities to Sunshine, but it’s still an easy 9-9.5 game. Reviewers provide opinions, and not all games are for everyone. I still think he was TRYING to be shocking in his review, though.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI